{"id":3547,"date":"2009-03-17T22:30:03","date_gmt":"2009-03-18T05:30:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/stephendanko.com\/blog\/2009\/03\/17\/time-to-the-most-recent-common-ancestor\/"},"modified":"2009-03-17T22:30:03","modified_gmt":"2009-03-18T05:30:03","slug":"time-to-the-most-recent-common-ancestor","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stephendanko.com\/blog\/3547","title":{"rendered":"Time to the Most Recent Common Ancestor"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>At the recent Family Tree DNA 5th International Conference on Genetic Genealogy for Project Administrators, Dr. Michael Hammer of the University of Arizona discussed advances in calculating the time to the most recent common ancestor (TMRCA).<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\"><a class=\"imagelink\" title=\"Michael Hammer\" href=\"https:\/\/stephendanko.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/03\/Michael-Hammer.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" id=\"image3548\" style=\"width: 462px; height: 311px\" height=\"311\" alt=\"Michael Hammer\" src=\"https:\/\/stephendanko.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/03\/Michael-Hammer.jpg\" width=\"462\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p align=\"center\"><strong><em>Michael Hammer, PhD<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>SOURCE: Michael Hammer, PhD (Houston, Harris County, Texas). Photographed by Stephen J. Danko on 15 March 2009.<\/p>\n<p>Microsatellites or short tandem repeats (STRs) in DNA were first discovered in the 1980s. Genetic genealogists\u00c2\u00a0compare the lengths of these STRs present in the Y-chromosome of two individuals in order to estimate the TMRCA.<\/p>\n<p>Several models have been developed over the years to estimate the TMRCA:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>The Symmetric Single Step Model<\/strong> (Ohta T. and M. Kimura, 1973 A model of mutation appropriate to estimate the number of electrophoretically detectable alleles in a genetic population. Genet. Res. 22:201-204.)<\/li>\n<li><strong>The Asymmetric Mutation Model<\/strong> (Walsh J.B., 1987 Persistence of tandem arrays: implications for satellite and simple-sequence DNAs. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.genetics.org\/cgi\/reprint\/115\/3\/553?ijkey=e0dec2098f3295828feb3bda07190fdffbc7d432\">Genetics 115:553-567<\/a>.)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Multiple Step Models<\/strong> (DiRienzo A., A.C. Peterson, J.C. Garza, A.M. Valdes, M. Statkin et al., 1994 Mutational processes of simple-sequence repeat loci in human populations. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pnas.org\/content\/91\/8\/3166.full.pdf+html\">Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:3166-3170<\/a>; Fu Y.-X., and R. Chakraborty, 1998 Simultaneous estimation of all the parameters of a stepwise mutation model. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.genetics.org\/cgi\/reprint\/150\/1\/487\">Genetics 150:487-497<\/a>.)<\/li>\n<li><strong>The Proportional Slippage Model<\/strong> (Kruglyak S., R. Durrett, M.D. Schug, and C.F. Aquadro, 1998 Equilibrium distributions of microsatellite repeat length resulting from a balance between slippage events and point mutations. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pnas.org\/content\/95\/18\/10774.full.pdf+html\">Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:10774-10778<\/a>; Ellegren H., 2000 Microsatellite mutations in the genome: implications for evolutionary inference. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science?_ob=ArticleURL&#038;_udi=B6TCY-41S4XRM-F&#038;_user=10&#038;_rdoc=1&#038;_fmt=&#038;_orig=search&#038;_sort=d&#038;view=c&#038;_acct=C000050221&#038;_version=1&#038;_urlVersion=0&#038;_userid=10&#038;md5=73b9a1ecbf867bf9211a65e50a88b386\">Trends Genet. 16:551-555<\/a>)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Different STRs mutate at different rates, and different lengths of STRs mutate at different rates. In general, the longer the STR, the faster the mutation rate.<\/p>\n<p>Watkins&#8217; Geometric Geometric Model uses four parameters to estimate TMRCA:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>STRs mutate with the probability \u00ce\u00bc<\/li>\n<li>STRs mutate up or down with the probability \u00cf\u0081<\/li>\n<li>STRs mutate in multisteps with the probability \u00ce\u00b1<\/li>\n<li>STRs mutate with allele-specific mutations with the probability \u00ce\u00b2<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>When provided with defined pedigrees and STR data, genetic genealogists attempt to calculate the values of \u00ce\u00bc, \u00cf\u0081, \u00ce\u00b1, and \u00ce\u00b2 that are most likely.<\/p>\n<p>Mike Hammer described a method to estimate these parameters for single copy STRs by measuring the number of mutations for each STR and calculating the mutation rate \u00ce\u00bc for each STR. More mutations are recovered from STRs with more meioses. Close relatives help estimate the \u00ce\u00b1 parameter.<\/p>\n<p>These four parameters can be calculated for each STR. In the panels of Y chromosome markers offered by <a href=\"http:\/\/www.familytreedna.com\/\">Family Tree DNA<\/a>, there are both fast and slow changing markers. Panel #2, as a whole, is faster moving than Panel #1, and Panel #3, in general, is faster moving than Panel #2.<\/p>\n<p>The calculation of TMRCA will continue to be refined as more data is collected.<\/p>\n<p>See Watkins J.C. 2007 Microsatellite evolution: Markov transition functions for a suite of models. <a href=\"http:\/\/math.arizona.edu\/~jwatkins\/strtpb.pdf\">Theor. Popul. Biol. 71:147-159<\/a> for a more detailed discussion of models of STR mutation rates.<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">Copyright \u00a9 2009 by Stephen J. Danko<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>At the recent Family Tree DNA 5th International Conference on Genetic Genealogy for Project Administrators, Dr. Michael Hammer of the University of Arizona discussed advances in calculating the time to the most recent common ancestor (TMRCA). <a href=\"https:\/\/stephendanko.com\/blog\/3547\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[1],"tags":[186],"class_list":["post-3547","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-ftdna-conference-2009"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pyBfX-Vd","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stephendanko.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3547","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stephendanko.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stephendanko.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stephendanko.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stephendanko.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3547"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stephendanko.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3547\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stephendanko.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3547"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stephendanko.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3547"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stephendanko.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3547"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}