{"id":1671,"date":"2007-08-29T00:01:46","date_gmt":"2007-08-29T07:01:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/stephendanko.com\/blog\/2007\/08\/29\/thoughts-on-ancestrys-internet-biographical-collection\/"},"modified":"2007-08-29T00:01:46","modified_gmt":"2007-08-29T07:01:46","slug":"thoughts-on-ancestrys-internet-biographical-collection","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stephendanko.com\/blog\/1671","title":{"rendered":"Thoughts on Ancestry's Internet Biographical Collection"},"content":{"rendered":"

I first found out about Ancestry’s Internet Biographical Collection on Monday from Dick Eastman’s blog<\/a>. I didn’t pay much attention, but I noticed that several people were rather angry about the collection.<\/p>\n

Then, on Tuesday, Janice of Cow Hampshire<\/a> left on comment on my blog alerting me to the fact that Ancestry had cached my blog in the Internet Biographical Collection and was requiring a paid subscription to view the cached pages. Thanks, Janice. You got my attention.<\/p>\n

Viewing the Cached Pages<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

By the time I looked at the collection, Ancestry had already made changes, making the Collection a free database and including a link to the original website on the record page. I\u00c2\u00a0did not see\u00c2\u00a0the original presentation of the database that originally created so much furor.<\/p>\n

The current format of\u00c2\u00a0Ancestry<\/a>‘s cached\u00c2\u00a0database is not much different than the search results obtained from Google<\/a>, Yahoo!<\/a>, or the Internet Archive Wayback Machine<\/a>. My blog is cached in all those places. One notable difference, though, is that the cached pages on Google and Yahoo both include a disclaimer at the top of the cached page indicating that the content does not belong to them. Ancestry and the Wayback Machine currently do not include such disclaimers.<\/p>\n

How Can I Enforce My Copyright?<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

My blog is protected by copyright. A while back,\u00a0an attorney who specializes in copyrights, patents, and trademarks recommended that I add a copyright statement on my blog. While a copyright notice is not required in order to protect my creative work, the notice is intended to remind others that\u00c2\u00a0the work is, indeed,\u00a0copyrighted.<\/p>\n

However, to file suit to enforce the copyright, I must register my creative works with the United States Copyright Office. Online works must be submitted in full, regardless of length, either on CD or in printed form and a $45 fee must accompany the registration. If the work is not registered, I cannot sue to enforce the copyright.<\/p>\n

If\u00c2\u00a0I register the work, I can sue for actual damages. Given that I don’t make any money on this blog, I’d have a hard time proving actual damages. But, if I had registered the creative work before the act of infringement, I could sue for statutory damages up to $150,000 without the need to demonstrate actual damages.<\/p>\n

Unfortunately, a district court in Nevada<\/a> determined that Google’s cache complied with Fair Use in the United States. If\u00c2\u00a0authors\u00c2\u00a0don’t want their website or blog cached, the author must take the initiative to prevent their online works from being cached. Other genealogy blogs have\u00c2\u00a0mentioned ways to do this. Note that this same precedent may not apply\u00c2\u00a0in other countries, however.<\/p>\n

With all this information, it seems that it’s up to me to ensure that my blog is not cached .\u00a0A lawsuit would probably not be productive.<\/p>\n

Be aware that I am not a lawyer and I am not qualified to give others legal advice. The discussion above is based on my own limited understanding of copyright law.<\/p>\n

To Cache or Not To Cache?<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

One problem with online information is that content that’s here today may be gone tomorrow. If my blog is removed from the Internet, the cache may be the only way to recover the information previously there. Broken links abound on the Internet. So do cached representations of what was once located on missing web pages.<\/p>\n

If I decide to stop paying for web hosting, my blog will disappear. If someone who uses free hosting through Blogspot, WordPress, LiveJournal, etc. doesn’t post anything for a while, the host may delete the blog. The content would be lost\u00c2\u00a0unless cached.<\/p>\n

If, however, I want to erase all traces of my blog from the Internet, cached remnants\u00c2\u00a0may remain. I guess this means that we should be careful when posting information on the Internet. Once posted, it may be cached forever. Or maybe not. It all depends on how long the cache is preserved.<\/p>\n

So What Will I Do?<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

Since Ancestry is now allowing free access to the cached pages of my blog and is now providing a more easily located\u00c2\u00a0link back to my blog, I don’t have any significant issues with my blog being cached by Ancestry. At this point, the cache appears to be little different than the caches maintained by Google, Yahoo! and the Wayback Machine. If I don’t like the idea of my blog being cached, I\u00c2\u00a0can take steps to prevent cached posts from all sources, not just Ancestry.<\/p>\n

The debut of Ancestry’s Internet Biographical Collection has generated a lot of justifiable anger. I’m grateful to those whose posts and comments\u00c2\u00a0encouraged Ancestry to change their policies on this database. I’m also encouraged by the fact that Ancestry actually listened.<\/p>\n

With luck, someone may actually find my blog through the cache on Ancestry, and I’m all for that. And, if Ancestry continues to maintain the cache of my blog after the blog itself ceases to exist, well I’m all for that, too.<\/p>\n

Copyright \u00a9 2007 by Stephen J. Danko<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

I first found out about Ancestry’s Internet Biographical Collection on Monday from Dick Eastman’s blog. I didn’t pay much attention, but I noticed that several people were rather angry about the collection. Then, on Tuesday, Janice of Cow Hampshire left … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1671","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-daily-journal"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pyBfX-qX","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stephendanko.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1671","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stephendanko.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stephendanko.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stephendanko.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stephendanko.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1671"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stephendanko.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1671\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stephendanko.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1671"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stephendanko.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1671"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stephendanko.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1671"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}