![\"\u00e2\u20ac\u0153Ciechanowskie](\"https:\/\/stephendanko.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/12\/CGW-107-57V1.jpg\" "\\"\u00e2\u20ac\u0153Ciechanowskie")
<\/a><\/p>\n“Ciechanowskie Grodzkie Wieczyste”, sygn.107, k.57v<\/p>\n
SOURCE: Klonowo, Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, “Ciechanowskie Grodzkie Wieczyste,” sygn.107, k.57v, Grabowski v. Niedzia\u0142kowski, 1756; Archiwum G\u0142\u00f3wne Akt Dawnych w Warszawie, Warsaw, Poland.<\/p>\n
Translated from Latin to Polish, and then from Polish to English, the record states:<\/p>\n
…Sebastian Mi\u0142oszewski and claimed by Wojciech Grabowski to be part of Fr\u0105cowizna, and claimed by Pawe\u0142 and Rafa\u0142 D\u0142ugo\u0142\u0119cki to be part of their inheritance called B\u0119benkowizna, was granted to that B\u0119benkowizna. Also, three plots near the above three plots, being in possession of the heirs of the deceased J\u00f3zef Klonowski, will be divided in half, the half on the B\u0119benkowizna to Fr\u0105cowizna and the other half to J\u00f3zwowizna.
\nIn the field below Kamieniec 16 plots from Graniczka through two stops to Rowa B\u0142otny between the boundary line of the heirs of the deceased Andrzej Klonowski and Bruki, which lands Wojciech Grabowski claimed were part of Skaskowizna, Ulatowizna, and Fr\u0105cowizna, and on which the heirs of the deceased J\u00f3zef Klonowski have a lien covering parts of D\u0142ugo\u0142\u0119ka Wielka and Klonowo, and made by Katarzyna Klonowska, widow of the deceased J\u00f3zef D\u0142ugo\u0142\u0119cki and the deceased Stanis\u0142aw Smole\u0144ski, as well as her sons Maciej and Micha\u0142 D\u0142ugo\u0142\u0119cki for things of Kazimierz D\u0142ugo\u0142\u0119cki, the son of the deceased Marcin, in the local records on the Monday after the Feast of St. Anne, Mother of the Blessed Virgin Mary in the year 1727, has been awarded to Wojciech Grabowski.
\nAlso in the field below W\u00f3lka in the place called Przy G\u0142og, in the second flat after two plots from Graniczka through Klin to the G\u0119balski border between Skaskowizna and G\u0142owa Przeczy, one half from the Skaskowizna side was allocated to Fr\u0105cowizna, and the other to J\u00f3zwowizna.
\nAs for the meadow called Pogrzel, this does not belong to either Fr\u0105cowizna or Ulatowizna. …<\/p><\/blockquote>\nTo be continued…<\/p>\n
For other parts of this record, see:<\/p>\n
\n
- In Trouble with the Law (Part 1 of 18)<\/a><\/li>\n
- In Trouble with the Law (Part 2 of 18)<\/a><\/li>\n
- In Trouble with the Law (Part 3 of 18)<\/a><\/li>\n
- In Trouble with the Law (Part 4 of 18)<\/a><\/li>\n
- In Trouble with the Law (Part 5 of 18)<\/a><\/li>\n
- In Trouble with the Law (Part 6 of 18)<\/a><\/li>\n
- In Trouble with the Law (Part 7 of 18)<\/a><\/li>\n
- In Trouble with the Law (Part 8 of 18)<\/a><\/li>\n
- In Trouble with the Law (Part 9 of 18)<\/a><\/li>\n
- In Trouble with the Law (Part 10 of 18)<\/a><\/li>\n
- In Trouble with the Law (Part 11 of 18)<\/a><\/li>\n
- In Trouble with the Law (Part 12 of 18)<\/a><\/li>\n
- In Trouble with the Law (Part 13 of 18)<\/a><\/li>\n
- In Trouble with the Law (Part 14 of 18)<\/a><\/li>\n
- In Trouble with the Law (Part 15 of 18)<\/a><\/li>\n
- In Trouble with the Law (Part 16 of 18)<\/a><\/li>\n
- In Trouble with the Law (Part 17 of 18)<\/a><\/li>\n
- In Trouble with the Law (Part 18 of 18)<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Copyright \u00a9 2010 by Stephen J. Danko<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Continuing with the court record of the case of Grabowski v. Niedzia\u0142kowski, let’s examine the fourteenth page of the record: \u201dCiechanowskie Grodzkie Wieczyste\u201d, sygn.107, k.57v. Continue reading