![\"\u00e2\u20ac\u0153Ciechanowskie](\"https:\/\/stephendanko.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/12\/CGW-107-53V.jpg\" "\\"\u00e2\u20ac\u0153Ciechanowskie")
<\/a><\/p>\nCiechanowskie Grodzkie Wieczyste\u201d, sygn.107, k.53v<\/p>\n
SOURCE: Klonowo, Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, Ciechanowskie Grodzkie Wieczyste,\u201d sygn.107, k.53v, Grabowski v. Niedzia\u0142kowski, 1756; Archiwum G\u0142\u00f3wne Akt Dawnych w Warszawie, Warsaw, Poland.<\/p>\n
Translated from Latin to Polish, and then from Polish to English, the record states:<\/p>\n
…disputes and grievances, and which took place on the Thursday after Easter in the year 1750, and that of the Oblates in the municipal records of Ciechan\u00f3w on the Monday after the third Sunday after Easter in that same year. At that time, Wojciech Grabowski and his wife Konstancja Milewska filed a protest against the spouses Krzysztof and Konstancja n\u00e9e \u017baboklicka, the parents, the spouses Ignacy and Zofia n\u00e9e Kaminska, Mateusz, their son, and also Melchior, son of the deceased Franciszek, all Niedzia\u0142kowskis, also J\u00f3zef Niedzia\u0142kowski, son of the deceased Adam, and his brothers, all heirs of the deceased Andrzej Niedzia\u0142kowski and other additional defendants, about a violation of their property in the villages of Klonowo and D\u0142ugo\u0142\u0119ka in the sections known as Skaskowizna, Ulatowizna and Fr\u0105cowizna.
\nAs a result of that decree, the field from the rural road to Przeczy…<\/p><\/blockquote>\nTo be continued…<\/p>\n
The last few lines of the Latin record seem to be missing from the Polish translation. I will have to look into this omission later.<\/p>\n
For other parts of this record, see:<\/p>\n
\n
- In Trouble with the Law (Part 1 of 18)<\/a><\/li>\n
- In Trouble with the Law (Part 2 of 18)<\/a><\/li>\n
- In Trouble with the Law (Part 3 of 18)<\/a><\/li>\n
- In Trouble with the Law (Part 4 of 18)<\/a><\/li>\n
- In Trouble with the Law (Part 5 of 18)<\/a><\/li>\n
- In Trouble with the Law (Part 6 of 18)<\/a><\/li>\n
- In Trouble with the Law (Part 7 of 18)<\/a><\/li>\n
- In Trouble with the Law (Part 8 of 18)<\/a><\/li>\n
- In Trouble with the Law (Part 9 of 18)<\/a><\/li>\n
- In Trouble with the Law (Part 10 of 18)<\/a><\/li>\n
- In Trouble with the Law (Part 11 of 18)<\/a><\/li>\n
- In Trouble with the Law (Part 12 of 18)<\/a><\/li>\n
- In Trouble with the Law (Part 13 of 18)<\/a><\/li>\n
- In Trouble with the Law (Part 14 of 18)<\/a><\/li>\n
- In Trouble with the Law (Part 15 of 18)<\/a><\/li>\n
- In Trouble with the Law (Part 16 of 18)<\/a><\/li>\n
- In Trouble with the Law (Part 17 of 18)<\/a><\/li>\n
- In Trouble with the Law (Part 18 of 18)<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Copyright \u00a9 2010 by Stephen J. Danko<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Continuing with the court record of the case of Grabowski v. Niedzia\u0142kowski, let’s examine the sixth page of the record: \u201dCiechanowskie Grodzkie Wieczyste\u201d, sygn.107, k.53v. Continue reading